Completely Bloody Incoherent

What is art: is it the grandiose plays of Shakespeare, or your mothers half-remembered childhood stories? What does it mean to be an actor: are you an artist in your own right, or a writers puppet? And what does it mean to take artistic risks: are you a pioneer, or simply wasting money?
Completely Bloody Incoherent situates itself at the heart of these debates. Drawing its title from the abundance of negative, male-authored criticism dismissing woman-authored postmodern theatre as incoherent, the play sets to challenge entrenched ideals of naturalistic, coherent storytelling and the hierarchies that uphold them. Weaving between fragments of a disruptive narrative, we are made to confront the difficulties of communication, the restrictive dictates of art, and the power structures embedded in theatrical performance.
Completely Bloody Incoherent situates itself at the heart of these debates. Drawing its title from the abundance of negative, male-authored criticism dismissing woman-authored postmodern theatre as incoherent, the play sets to challenge entrenched ideals of naturalistic, coherent storytelling and the hierarchies that uphold them. Weaving between fragments of a disruptive narrative, we are made to confront the difficulties of communication, the restrictive dictates of art, and the power structures embedded in theatrical performance.
Where & when
No performances found.
Event data provided by DataThistle